data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9e497/9e497d02b990e0b166b03225b89ee997799c588b" alt="Avidemux full"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a5567/a5567c41cc0457e1c0b4c36ad8fb1495e3769457" alt="avidemux full avidemux full"
However, it does open many more file formats without the fuss that Premiere sometimes makes about licensing. Comparing it with Adobe Premiere Pro is misleading, it is a vastly simpler piece of software that doesn't begin to do the same kinds of audio/video editing. – Glenn Seto 21:59, 5 February 2007 (UTC) Reply Also, I do not believe phrases such as "Some people think." and ".boasts such features." are entirely NPOV. And even then, it may not belong here, in Wikipedia. And only when they say it's planned, it can be considered a planned feature. Only Mean or other Avidemux developers know what they plan to do. That's pretty much what this section represents (random suggestions from various users without getting answers from the developers). Anyone can ask for any feature in Avidemux and then, without getting any answer, put it the "Future plans" section, cunfusing the readers who may think that these are planned features. Secondly, the "Proposed (but unconfirmed or undecided) features" section is just pure speculation that's not based on anything real. what it is and what it can do, not a development info. Firstly, users interested in Avidemux development can see all these details elesewhere (mailing list with patches, web forum, bug tracker), this is just general info page about the Avidemux application, i.e. I don't think that the "Future plans" section is appropriate for a Wikipedia article. That was all! In this way was no encyclopedian relevance visible. "Reason: The article just said that it is a software and what it can do. Dazu wurde auch in der Diskussion nichts beigetragen.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2d8c8/2d8c8c6245ca27d7e8691ad3320ef01aea843485" alt="avidemux full avidemux full"
Das war alles! Damit ist keine wie auch immer geartete enzyklopädische Relevanz erkennbar. "Begründung: Im Artikel stand, das es sich um eine Software handelt und was sie kann. Though 12:0 votes for keeping it was deleted Locally hosted version (Googlecache-Entries removed) in case googlecache is refreshed: Avidemux.the page fetched from googlecache: Avidemux.But above all it is pure advertisingbleh." A widespread distrubution like par example VirtualDub has unfortunately I cannot see in this case. "Reason:Advertising text for a softwareproduct of doubtable relevance. Eine Verbreitung wie sie zum Beispiel bei VirtualDub vorhanden ist kann ich hier nicht erkennen. "Begründung:Werbetext für ein Softwareprodukt zweifelhafter Relevanz. The german Avidemux entry has been deleted
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9e497/9e497d02b990e0b166b03225b89ee997799c588b" alt="Avidemux full"